| |
The Oil Spill |
| |
What to do? |
| |
Oiled Beaches |
ECOLOGICAL RAMIFICATIONS
NOAA scientists have
determined that beaches treated with hot water
recover more slowly than those left untreated.
Not only does hot water sterilize, but it drives
oil from the more desolate beach areas where
fewer organisms live to the subtidal zone
occupied by clams and other crustaceans more
sensitive to oil than the barnacles and mussels
found on the more exposed intertidal areas.
Subtidal invertebrates
proved to be highly vulnerable to the oil
spilled from the Amoco Cadiz tanker in 1978 off
the coast of Brittany.10 #10.
National Research Council. Oil in the Sea:
Inputs, Fates, and Effects . National Academy
Press: Washington, DC, 1985.
___________________
"Inipol
EAP-22 (oleophilic liquid fertilizer developed
by a French firm in response to the Amoco Cadiz
oil spill off the coast of France)" EPA
Coping With
an Oiled Sea (Part 7 of 11)
In the wake of
the Amoco Cadiz oil spill the. French
government established CEDRE, the ...
Contingency Plans in France and in the ...
This oil spill
was 6.5 times larger than the Exxon Valdez
oil spill: 68 million gallons. The French
have been experimenting with biodegradation
accelerating agents. They still prefer
containment to dispersing agents, but it is
still allowed per this article (p 3 of 11
pages)
"The French
supplied one of the Products (Inipol eap 22)
for bioremediation experiments in Prince
William Sound" "In the wake of the Amoco
Cadez oil spill the French govt established
CEDRE the Center for Documentation, Research
and Experimentation on accidennntal
pollution"
_________________
The high pressure washes (at
pressures up to 100 psi) can also cause shifting
beach sediment that can suffocate clams and
worms, impeding recolonization.
The recovery of the ecosystem after the
68-million-gallon Amoco Cadiz oil spill suggests
the best cleanup strategy might be to allow
nature to run its own course.
As NOAA chief scientist
Sylvia A. Earle has said, "Sometimes the best,
and ironically the most difficult, thing to do
in the face of an ecological disaster is to do
nothing."12
In contrast, the EPA believes
that physical cleaning of the beaches by Exxon
dispersed the oil such that the greater surface
area of the exposed oil allowed for enhanced
biodegradation., which was limited only to the
availability of nitrogen and phosphorus
nutrients. The application of nitrogen- and
phosphorus-containing fertilizers
(bioremediation), according to EPA, caused no
adverse ecological effects. Musselsn suspended
in floating cages just offshore from the treated
beaches exhibited no bioaccumulation. 13
Beach cleaning was also
recommended by the Alaska Department of Fish and
Game, whose agenda was to ensure a clean
breeding site for seals and sea lions.
Furthermore, the state officials contended that
the oil had already suffocated most of the
intertidal life.14
OIL SPILL
PREVENTION STRATEGIES RESULTING FROM EXXON
VALDEZ OIL SPILL
As the most studied oil spill
to date and the largest such incident in U.S.
waters, the Exxon Valdez oil spill was a major
impetus to the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, which
established a five-cent per barrel tax on oil to
create a $1 billion per spill cleanup fund.
Although oil spill accidents represent only 5%
of the estimated 700 million gallons of oil
entering the seas annually, they dispense a very
concentrated dose of oil to the environment when
they occur.
The American Petroleum
Institute, in acknowledging the futility of
dealing with a catastrophic tanker spill, has
stated the following: "Further research into
recovery technology can certainly help in this
regard, but it is not considered likely that we
can move to the point of guaranteeing
containment and recovery at sea."15 Thus, the
emphasis ought to be on oil spill prevention.
Notable improvements have been made in the area
of prevention as a result of the Exxon Valdez
oil spill.
Ship Escort and Response
Vessel System (SERVS)
SERVS is a
more secure oil transport system that has been
implemented by Alyeska at an annual cost of $50
million. This system provides tanker escort for
the 60 miles to the ocean entrance to PWS by two
vessels, one of which is a 210-foot ship
equipped with oil skimmers, containment boom,
oil dispersants, and oil storage tanks.16
Marine Spill Response
Corporation (MSRC)
U.S. oil companies have
created MSRC, which consists of five regional
spill centers, any one of which could handle an
oil spill of 200,000 barrels. Established at an
initial cost of $900 million in 1991, the MSRC
plans to spend between $30 and 35 million on
research and development of oil spill cleanup
technology over a five-year period. It expects
to contribute $1 million to $4 million per year
thereafter.9
Hull design
If a normal tanker hull is
ruptured, oil is released into the water because
the oil pressure exceeds the water pressure.
However, in hydrostatic loading the oil would
not be released because seawater would exert
greater pressure than the oil in the tanker.
This differential pressure would result from the
incomplete loading of the hull to allow for a
compressible air space above the oil. Under the
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 double-hulled tankers,
which provide a protective space between the
outside wall of the vessel and the inner wall of
the oil storage tank, will be required by 2015
in all U.S. waters. However, double hulls offer
only a partial solution. In a high-impact
collision, such as occurred in the Exxon Valdez
accident, the accumulation of hydrocarbons in
the space between the hulls could increase the
likelihood of explosion.14
Remote-sensing
technology
In the event of a future oil
spill, remote-sensing technology may be helpful
in locating the thicker region of a slick.
Ultraviolet (UV) devices can differentiate
between oil and water because the aromatic
compounds in oil absorb UV light. While aromatic
compounds in oil containing conjugated ¹-bond
systems absorb light in the UV range (200-380
nm), water still absorbs more UV radiation than
does oil. Infrared (IR) systems can discern
differences in sea-surface temperature due to
the differences in the physical properties of
oil and water. Oil thicker than several
thousandths of an inch can sustain a detectable
difference in temperature. However, temperatures
drop at night with an attendant alteration of
the image. A third innovative approach involves
a laser fluorosensor. While the oil absorbs
light in the UV range, it would fluorescem in
the visible spectrum. The unique fluorescense
spectrum of the oil would prevent any ambiguity
with the spectra of algae or anything else
floating on the water. In fact, based on the oil
fluorescence spectrum , it is possible to
differentiate between diesel fuel, crude oil,
and bunker fuel.14
Articles - References
Measuring Toxicity