|
Exxon's CoverUp
My name is Capt Richard D. Nagel and
I worked the largest oil spill in
this hemisphere for three years
in a row beginning in 1989,
continuing through 1990 and 1991. I
was a licensed Master Captain (still
am) and also I worked as an
advisor. Plus I was on the Prince
William Sound Advisory Committee for
several years and oversaw arrivals
and departures of tankers in Prince
William Sound.
What I am about to tell you is of my
own free will, it is all true and I
assume full responsibility and no
one else shall be held accountable
in any way whatsoever. This is not
fiction, even though at times it
might sound like it, I assure you
it's all true.
Beginning in 1989 (the year of the
spill) I worked half a dozen or so
different vessels through out Prince
William Sound from Valdez to Cordova
to Whittier. Most of what I did in
89 was support, but also I
understood that Exxon had begun
spraying test sites on
Knight Island
with
Inipol EAP 22
and Corexit to see the effects on
oily beaches and to see if indeed
spraying chemicals would be more
effective than the hot water
spraying that was going on
everywhere in the summer of 89.
One question that puzzles me is:
did Exxon take into consideration
the effects on the people that would
be working with these chemicals?
Did they have a long or even short
term health monitoring system in
operation to treat exposed workers?
The answer is a flat "NO" There was
more concern for the wild life
habitat than that of humans working
with untested chemicals.
* Please do not take me in the
wrong context for I am a very firm
believer in all animal and
environmental issues, I would not
have worked the oilspill for three
years in a row if I did not believe
that I could make a difference.
In the Spring of 1990 I joined
several survey teams in Prince
William Sound to see the effects of
what the Winter storms had on the
oily beaches. It was my conclusion
that the Winter storms did more of a
cleanup than all the hot water
spraying in the late summer of 1989
did, believe me, I feel that Mother
Nature takes care of her own quite
well, of course as I have stated
before that's my own assessment. In
May of 1990 I slipped on some oily
rocks and shattered my right knee
and was side lined from the oilspill
cleanup, but not for long. In June
I returned to Prince William Sound
with a leg brace and continued
working the oilspill on board the
Landing Craft Pegasus
*
* as a pilot. The Pegasus had a
very large tank of Inipol 22 on her
deck, just how many gallons I don't
recall.
But let's back up for a second.
During the surveys and shortly
thereafter there was a berthing
vessel in Bay of Isles, Knight
Island called the M/V Columbia.
* What's interesting about this
is the
M/V
Columbia had her own fresh water
salization system. This is all fine
and dandy, except for one thing,
just a stone's throw away from where
the M/V Columbia was anchored Exxon
was spraying Inipol 22 all over the
beaches, which at high tide went
into the water and eventually into
the water system of the M/V
Columbia. Now my question is does a
salization system filter out
chemicals? I think not.
At any rate on board the Pegasus as
I stated before we had a very large
tank of Inipol 22 that we used to
supply beach workers: they had back
packs full of Inipol 22 that they
used to spray beaches, we also
supplied pontoon
*
* vessels with Inipol 22.
Exxon's main objective in 1990 was
to spray chemicals all over Prince
William Sound and the Kenai
Peninsula, and this we all did.
The important thing to note here is
that Exxon never trained anyone,
well at least not anyone directly
associated with the transporting or
spraying of Inipol 22. We were told
by Exxon that Inipol 22 was as safe
as honey on toast which is why once
the transferring and spraying
started there were
no Exxon supervisors
to be found anywhere. Now
on this web
site there're photos of
beach workers spraying beaches; no
real protection is being used, why?
Because none was issued.
... and more
... this is a 'preview' version
immune
Starting in early 1993 I started
getting sick. Seems like every time
there was a flu going around I
always got it and it stayed with me
longer than anyone else.
...
Some health issues
for Richard
http://www.valdezlink.com/evos/capt_richard.htm
page 1 of 4
It's been a lot of years since the
spill and my health has gotten worse
and worse; I once weighed a robust
260 lbs at the beginning of the
spill, today a mere 172 lbs and
still losing.
First stomach cancer ... & here're
my problems now: I have
hypocalcemia, (& hymolytic anemia)
* , Hepatitis C, seizures,
severe pain in my back and right
leg, hot flashes, night sweats,
severe depression, acute anxiety,
loss of balance, blurred vision, no
appetite, calcium breakdown, memory
loss and severe migraine headaches,
weight loss
and more
So why am I writing all this? I
want everyone that worked the
oilspill or even if you didn't but
you know someone who did... to stand
up and be heard.
Above received
11-8-03
He would like to
receive mail.
c/o
More info
Inipol EAP 22 is like - Corexit is
like
Personal
Protective Equipment?
Also
Other
Exposures Shared by the Public to
Various Chemical Exposures
And these, too
- 2-butoxyethanol & some others
Please pray
for all who are exposed to
2-butoxyethanol
"Hemolytic anemia -
means that the red blood
cells break down and
release their
hemoglobin.
Solvents adversely
affect the bone marrow.
That is where the blood
cells are formed.
Solvents are stored in
fat portions of the body
(bone marrow, brain,
nerve coverings, liver,
fatty tissue)"
Janette Sherman, MD &
toxicologist
Check
|
It is
also
interesting
to note that
Inipol EAP
22,
the
experimental
compound of
'bioremediation'
was
purported to
be a
fertilizer.
Could
anything be
farther from
the truth!?
*
It was like
'Spray 'n
Washing' the
beaches with
solvent/pesticide/poison
in refined
oil.
The
chemicals we
are
concerned
with
(2-butoxyethanol,
diethylene
glycol
monobutyl
ether,
ethylene
oxide) are
pesticides
and are most
harmful in
aerosol
spray or
liquid. |
|
|